I thought this was about Texas Tech, seeing all the suck around. AHHHH!!!? DID HE JUST MAKE A TEXAS TECH AND OHIO STATE JOKE??? HE DESERVES A GOLD MEDAL! HAVE A SILVER INSTEAD. WHY THANK YOU MASON AND DANNY.
Settle Down Max no need. I don't think you have ever watched him play just by what we have told you, you are making inferences. Mrs. Shroeder would like you to name the independent variable
Since you rant every time I say something, I think I might do the same.
Mrs. Schroeder could care less. At thi point, there is no scientific way to prove Pryor is good with, or without scientific evidence. If you make a decision based on this, it is bias. And also, you can't answer these types of questions. They are all opinions (except for our thoughts on Iowa and North Texas) which science can't answer. You are entutled to your own opinion, and I get my own. I am stateing an opinion on the footage I have seen Pryor play. A question science CAN prove is if Pryor runs faster than Caveman Clark, in which the independent variable is who is running, while the dependent variable is how fast each run. Once again, multiple trials would have to be run so that the results are accurate. Science can't answer the statement, "Pryor is better than Caveman Clark" because there is no way of testing it. Any answer would be biased. You would be leaning towards your favorite team. So Mrs. Schroeder would be getting on your case, because you are attempting to bring science into a place where science is useless.